Part 1 laid the groundwork for this series by identifying some biblical principles that have a bearing on our understanding of hell. Part 2 gave three pictures of what hell might be, each of which finds some support in Scripture. Here in Part 3 I attempt to put it all together to formulate an alternate view of “hellfire” that is more consistent with the revelation we have of God’s character and purposes.
By taking into account the observations from Scripture in Part 1, assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the views in Part 2, and being careful not to build theories on faulty assumptions, we can come up with reasonable conclusions about what after-life judgment will be like.
Caution about Assumptions
Before attempting to answer the question “What is hellfire?” we really should examine the assumptions that are implicit in the question. Most English Bibles have taken four different biblical words (Hades, Sheol, Gehenna, and Tartarus) and translated them with the same English word (hell). That word is then invested with a meaning that the original speakers and writers never intended. Detailed studies of these four words and of the origins of the concept of hell have been done by many people more capable than I. For example, a number of nineteenth-century writers have written in-depth discussions of these words and traced the origins of the prevailing notion of hell.[i] Contemporary writers have come to many of the same conclusions; George Sarris[ii] asks and answers the question “Where did hell come from?” and explains Jesus' references to hell. John Noe[iii] has written a thoroughly researched and documented exploration of the whole concept of hell. I will not attempt to convey all their conclusions, but let me say that we need to be very careful not to make unwarranted assumptions. FULL POST 

Digg
Facebook
Twitter
Stumble
Reddit
Del.ico.us
Yahoo buz

