In the wake of President Obama’s public support for same-sex marriage and the passage of Amendment 1 in North Carolina, there has been heightened attention (as if such a thing were possible) on the way evangelical political engagement has had a focus on matters related to sex. One prominent conversation has concerned the ambivalence of young evangelicals regarding the public rhetoric and political strategies aimed at restricting abortion and fighting the cultural and legislative efforts tied to homosexuality.
This is actually not a new set of concerns; at least ten years ago many in the media pointed out that younger evangelicals wanted to be publically engaged but also wanted to expand the agenda beyond these hot-button issues. While I echo the need to have a public agenda that expands to include greater attention to issues such as poverty, environmental issues, the crisis in education and racial/ethnic/class concerns, I want to briefly draw attention to a few reasons why we very much need to do important work on matters related to sexuality.
First, it is important that we do a better job of helping Christians understand the importance of biblically rooted approach to sexuality while also putting it in proper perspective. I find myself wondering if the evangelical effort to seize the narrative about “great sex” from the clutches of the sexual revolution (in its various forms) has unwittingly led to giving sexual fulfillment in marriage such centrality to the description of a “normal” life that we have, perhaps unintentionally, stigmatized singleness of various forms. It is very important that we support traditional marriage and espouse that marital sex is great, but sexual fulfillment is not necessary to a truly full life, or do we want to suggest that even the life of Jesus was not fulfilling? FULL POST 

Digg
Facebook
Twitter
Stumble
Reddit
Del.ico.us
Yahoo buz
