Becky Moore, BCCLC, BCMFCTweet
Board Certified Life Coach and BCMFC with American Association of Christian Counselors (AACC/IBCC)
Posted 6/15/18 at 12:39 PM | Becky Moore, BCCLC, BCMFC
In a recent article at Market Watch, it is noted that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has cited the Bible to justify the separation of families at the U.S./Mexico border. Children are being taken from their parents.
According to this article a while back by journalist Mark Russell at Newser, "Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry are far more than just two hard-right Christian candidates angling for the GOP presidential nomination—both have ties to a scary, theocratic movement called Dominionism, writes Michelle Goldberg at the Daily Beast. While many have pooh-poohed those worrying about a Christian sect bent on world rule as paranoid, Goldberg says that this presidential nomination cycle has brought 'the most theocratic Republican field in American history. It turns out we weren't paranoid enough'".
For those of you who do not know, Bill Johnson of Bethel Church in Redding, California is a part of the leadership in the NAR and dominionism. Most sincere people involved in this group have no clue how their beloved gurus are shaping modern politics and society, for the worse, taking away our freedoms and the much-needed separation of church and state.
According to the article from Market Watch aforementioned, Sessions explained:
“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order. If you cross the Southwest border unlawfully, then the Department of Homeland Security will arrest you and the Department of Justice will prosecute you. Having children does not give you immunity from arrest and prosecution.” FULL POST
Posted 6/4/18 at 6:12 PM | Becky Moore, BCCLC, BCMFC
The term Pharisee is a hot buzzword these days. Why? Why should we care?
If one cares about politics and our society, he or she will definitely want to know about these modern Pharisees who have entered civil society and politics and are trying to influence President Trump. Their leader's book is fascist and militant. They have already influenced other politicians to join their cult (Rick Perry, for example).
What is a Pharisee, exactly? The ancient Pharisees were a sect of Judaism which followed the verbal traditions handed down from their "fathers" (the elders of the sect), also known as their traditions of men (Mark 7:8; Galatians 1:14). They strictly observed these traditions and looked down upon others who did not follow their traditions.
The Pharisees were the only group of men Jesus had a problem with. Why? Because they were cleverly and proudly deceiving innocent people for their own gain while claiming to represent God. To everyone else - the sinners, tax collectors, and prostitutes - Jesus showed love and compassion as well as truth spoken with love.
Does this happen today? It certainly does, and has for centuries (take, for example, the ancient Gnostics); however, today these "traditions of men" have come to be known as "new revelations" by way of dreams, visions and man-made notions invented by the modern-day, gnostic false prophets and false apostles, those who lead the dangerous and deceptive New Apostolic Reformation.
As an example of a dangerous, modern, pharisaical book, that is quite frightening and militant, check out The Final Quest by Rick Joyner. Rick Joyner can be seen praising Trump and disguising his movement with ear-tickling pomposity in the news clip provided.
The ancient Pharisees departed from the written word of Christ, relying on their own traditions instead. Thus, they were lax and liberal when it came to the written commands, especially the teachings of Christ who was their contemporary. Contrary to modern (pharisaical) thought, the Pharisees were not conservative, strict observers of the Bible/New Testament. In fact, the New Testament was not even written yet. Those who love the New Testament, the teachings of Christ, are not Pharisees.
The modern Pharisees put their own man-made traditions onto others in an effort to control. Of course, the modern Pharisees will tell you that anyone who opposes their agenda, or uses their own intellect, is a Pharisee, which is, of course, extremely twisted, but definitely not a surprising manipulation tactic. These modern Pharisees are notorious for demanding a blind following and demonizing those who insist on using their own intellects (or reading the Bible for themselves).
This is no joke; they write articles about the dangers of using your own brain, and the undiscerning buy into it. This of course is to gain a following and to disarm the discernment of their followers. This is how the occult works, and to most this would be a red flag, but you would be surprised at just how many people, even very bright people, have their minds molded by these men.
The modern Pharisees are alive and well today, and boy, are they deceiving millions (yes, millions) with fine-sounding rhetoric. Instead of exhibiting Christ's humble and service-based attitude, they exalt and aggrandize themselves above others as the "elite" group which is here to dominate society and wipe out those who oppose them. What the dominionists are doing is insisting on occupying the throne themselves, one that only Jesus occupies.
What's worse is that they tell others that Jesus wants them to take control. Jesus actually taught that the greatest is always the servant, not the one who seeks to be served or to dominate and gain control over others. This is not the true Gospel message.
"For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light." (2 Corinthians 11:13,14)
The dominionists, or modern-day Pharisees, have entered into conservative politics, believe it or not. Most have not noticed this because the leaders of dominionism do not claim to be anything other than Christians. In fact, they will flat-out deny that they are dominionists because they are lying and deceived. The truth is that they are hiding behind the facade of Christianity.
*Do·min·ion·ism (də-mĭn′yə-nĭz′əm) n. 1. The theory or doctrine that Christians have a divine mandate to assume positions of power and influence over all aspects of society and government.
Even, if it means using violence.
Slight problem. The Bible never asks Christians to take over civil society by way of what they call the Seven Mountains Mandate. Especially not by violence. This is absolutely outlandish, and according to this article at www.GotQuestions.org:
"The theology associated with the seven mountain mandate is dangerous, and it sheds a terribly negative light on Christians everywhere. The 7-M teaching puts a tremendous burden on believers to perform, make progress in their relative spheres of influence, and set the stage for Jesus’ return to earth—all without a definite end point. Little emphasis is placed on the gospel message of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ; the movement is more about staking claims and taking control. The seven mountain mandate is a movement led by false prophets, and it should be avoided and exposed whenever Bible-believing Christians encounter it." (Emphasis mine).
So, here are the seven mountains, according to the Seven Mountain Mandate:
Despite the absurdity of this merging of church and state, dominionists have somehow squeezed into politics, and are relentlessly pushing their Seven Mountains Mandate.
Christians are called to be lights in the world (Matthew 5:14). There is no biblical requirement, however, to take the helm of all the world systems in order to usher in Christ’s kingdom. The Bible says that the world will grow worse, not better, in the last days (2 Timothy 3:1, 13; 2 Peter 3:3). (1)
I am sure the founding fathers of America would also have a slight problem with the dominionists, like Rick Joyner, due to separation of church and state.
Here's where I really start scratching my head. Here is Rick Joyner, the leader of the dominionists, praising President Trump in the load of hot air below (see news clip provided).
I wonder, is the feeling mutual? Trump claims to be a Christian, but I certainly hope he could see through this empty talk disguised as Christian, which is intended to flatter.
Mishel McCumber, psychologist and author of The View Beneath, was once herself closely affiliated with Rick Joyner, the leader of dominionism. Now, in her book, she warns of the movement. McCumber explains:
"But here is where it gets really scary. Since Dominionists regard the Kingdom of God as a literal earthly kindgom to be advanced in the here and now, they believe, as Israel of old, they are commissioned to literally take up their swords against their enemies. Their literature, songs and sermons are rife with battle rehetoric. In fact, many Christian dominionists, such as those of the Apostolic and Prophetic movement, aim to justify, and even glorify, the killing of their enemies and romanticize the military-industrial complex. It goes beyond mere saber-rattling spiritual allegory." (2)
As if that weren't sketchy enough, she goes on to say:
"Radical Dominionists plan to take the battle against their flesh and blood enemies far beyond the spiritual realm. In other words, their doctrine includes a plan to kill those who oppose their agenda." (2)
Rick Joyner's own book, The Final Quest, contains his direct quotes concerning what he sees as an imminent, militant "civil war".
So again, I ask, is the feeling mutual? Rick Joyner is in the same dominionist camp as Bill Johnson, pastor of Bethel Church. I am sure you have noticed by now that there are countless critics of Bethel Church in Redding, California, many who are devout Christians. I am sure you would agree they are critics for very good reason (unless you like fascism).
Bethel "Church" is a place that rakes in millions upon millions of dollars to teach young men and women to do "miracles", among other peculiar practices. They are also embracing what they call "conversion therapy" which seeks to try to change a person's sexual orientation by psychological or spiritual means.
This is a problem. There are many licensed psychology professionals who warn that conversion therapy is potentially extremely harmful. Bethel Church also has invented a type of "unique" inner-healing practice called sozo, which is also quite controversial and is the subject of an ongoing public debate.
They tend to over-spiritualize and address issues that they ought not. Their tactics are not only extremely unbiblical but also fail to have any backing by the scientific community.
I have personally received emails from people around the world concerned about sozo, some telling me that sozo has ruined their marriages. One woman, a grandmother, emailed me years ago saddened that she had "lost" her granddaughter to the Bethel Supernatural School of Ministry. Her granddaughter isolated herself from her loved ones. Sometimes, sozo reveals false memories and ruins families. It is a new-age sort of hypnosis. FULL POST
Posted 6/3/18 at 12:04 PM | Becky Moore, BCCLC, BCMFC
Is the "tithe law" for today's Christian?
Like many concepts in the Bible, not every single one is necessarily for today. While generosity to the poor is a Biblical, New Testament ideal, tithing - giving a consistent ten percent of one's income to church leaders - is not for today. Here is another example: Leviticus 19:27 tells men to not shave their beards.
It would be nutty to tell others today that they must not shave their beards lest they incur a curse from God Himself.
The tithe is also found in Leviticus 27, for instance, and it is equally nutty to tell Christians to "test the tithe".
Journalist David Cary Hart recently penned an article about a controversial church called Bethel Church in Redding, California. Hart explained, "Suffice it to say that church leadership rakes in untold millions of tax-deducted dollars. Apparently, leader Bill Johnson's wife, his two sons and their wives are all on the payroll. Bethel Church is the perfect example of why churches should be required to file the same annual reports as every other nonprofit organization. It won't happen because Congress is scared to death of Christianity, Inc.". FULL POST
Posted 6/2/18 at 2:14 PM | Becky Moore, BCCLC, BCMFC
What is sozo? Why does it matter, and what ever happened to separation of church and state? Sozo is a new age, unique, inner-healing practice which is tied to Bethel Church in Redding, California, which has strong affiliation with the Latter Rain Movement and Dominionism. Dominionism is also known as the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), Joel's Army or the Seven Mountains Mandate. Bethel Church is the subject of public debate and is an extremely controversial "church" led by Bill Johnson. All these movements can be likened to separate, polluted "rivers" which may look different at first glance but truly come from the same muddy source.
The following is some rather helpful information on the "sketchy" history of sozo's related movements:
"The origins of the movement are sketchy, but trace back to at least two influences, the Latter Rain movement and Dominionism. The Latter Rain movement gained traction in the 1950's as a movement holding Pentecostal beliefs but largely outside the existing Pentecostal denominations, teaching the imminent rise of a victorious church that transcended denominational organizations and endowed with supernatural power through miraculous working of the Holy Spirit. The early Latter Rain movement is sometimes linked to William Branham, although most reject Branham's Jesus-only baptism beliefs, and may have also had some influence on parts of the Jesus Movement and on the Discipling and Shepherding movement. Among the Latter Rain movement's teachings were that the rise of a victorious church of "overcomers" endowed with supernatural power to wage spiritual warfare and perform miracles would usher in the second coming of Christ. The terms 'Manifest Sons of God' and 'Joel's Army' referred to these 'overcomers'. Dominionism is a movement that began in the 1970s with Calvinist roots, teaching that the Biblical admonition for Christians to 'take dominion' over all the earth includes taking dominion over civil government and law, and that civil law should be based on Biblical teachings." (1) FULL POST
Posted 3/29/18 at 6:52 PM | Becky Moore, BCCLC, BCMFC
Have you ever had a strange feeling in your gut about Calvary Chapel? If so, you will want to read this (it has been my most-viewed article on my website).
You walk into the church on a Sunday morning. Everyone is worshipping God with hands raised. You greet smiling faces. The message is delivered from the Bible (word for word) in a powerful, authoritative manner by the senior pastor. Greetings are made. You drop some money in the "tithe" box. Great day at church, and you do this year after year after year. The pastor says his church only goes by "the Word". Indeed, that's how it appears on the outside. You sense there is something wrong at the church, but you just cannot pinpoint it and doubt yourself. After all, the Bible is taught word for word from the pulpit, and there are a lot of members.
This church movement that claims to "simply teach the Word, simply" also follows a set of teachings they say are simply "foundational", written by a man named Chuck Smith. Oddly, these extra-Biblical doctrines are not brought up. Why? This set of "foundational" teachings that most Calvary Chapel churchgoers are kept in the dark about is (drum roll, please):
The Calvary Chapel Distinctives by Chuck Smith (PDF)
So, what is this "Distinctives" document, exactly? You thought that you were being taught by leaders whose allegiance, leadership models, practices and doctrines were solely based upon the Word of God and sound doctrine rightly divided (2 Tim. 2:15)? FULL POST
Posted 6/16/12 at 4:50 PM | Becky Moore, BCCLC, BCMFC
"...for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?" (2 Corinthians 6:14)
When I first heard of Bethel Church years ago (when someone was urging me to join), it was simply a small organization (claiming to be a Christian "church") in northern California. Now, its influence has grown worldwide. Its influence, along with "sozo" (a mystical, new age practice), has expanded to Russia, the UK, Australia and beyond. It is part of the nefarious NAR (New Apostolic Reformation) which has ties to a few conservative politicians. The leaders of NAR, like Rick Joyner, are rather militant and threaten to wipe out Christian denominations, creating one denomination (under their leadership, of course). Jesus said to "beware the yeast of the Pharisees". The Pharisees were an ancient sect of Judaism who were very lax and liberal (as opposed to strict and conservative) when it came to written Scripture and Bible interpretation, nullifying God's words while adding on their own clever and deceptive twists, rules and "traditions of men" (see Mark 7:13). They went "off the map" of truth and put their twisted interpretations onto others. Jesus had a problem with that. Like yeast in bread, a little yeast (lies/error/false teaching) spreads and can do a whole lot of damage. Likewise, the teachings coming out of Bethel Church have spread and are now harmful on an international level. I get emails from around the world from people (the ones from the grandmothers and mothers are the most heart-wrenching) who have lost family members to this cultic sect (or, should I say cult?).
In chapter 12 of When Heaven Invades Earth: A Practical Guide to a Life of Miracles, Bill Johnson, Senior Pastor of Bethel Church in Redding, California writes:
I have seen the small gems that suddenly appeared in the people's hands as they worshipped God. Since early in 1998, we have had feathers fall in our meetings. At first I thought birds were getting into our air conditioning ducts, but then they started falling in other rooms of the church not connected with the same ductwork. They now fall most anywhere we go - airports, homes, restaurants, offices and the like...He [God] wants to take us farther, and we can only get there by following signs. Our present understanding of scripture can only take us so far. (Page 204,205)
Johnson erroneously convinces people that these signs are from God and the Holy Spirit and our present understanding of scripture cannot take us far enough, and people eat up this nonsense. I (and multitudes of others) find this disturbing (and also a bit comical). On the same pages, he says that (uncontrolled) laughter, gold dust, oil and a cloud (appearing in the church building) are also signs of God's presence. He further explains in the same chapter that these signs and manifestations "are simple indicators of God's presence and purpose". He calls these signs God's "personal notes" to us. He clearly links these signs to our holy God and the Holy Spirit.
Is this correct? Most people who use their intellects would see through this garbage. Sadly, many drink up the Kool-Aid that Bethel Church is serving up. In scripture, believers are commanded to be scrutinizing (not blindly accepting) by putting what they see and hear to the test instead of accepting a teaching, sign or wonder right away, "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world" (1 John 4:1). FULL POST