Randal Rauser is associate professor of historical theology at Taylor Seminary, Edmonton, Canada and was granted Taylor's first annual teaching award for Outstanding Service to Students in 2005.
March 04th, 2010 02:27 PM ET
  • text size AAA

Why Mr. A believes we need a historical Adam

Ms. B: Mr. A, you look pensive. Is something wrong?

Mr. A: Well before I consider further your attempt to read the Genesis creation and fall narratives as mythical, I need to get something off my chest.

Ms. B: Go ahead Mr. A. There are no secrets here.

Mr. A: Okay, how can you suggest that Adam might not be a historical figure when he is treated as such in the New Testament? Luke's genealogy of Jesus ends with Adam "the son of God." (Luke 3:38)

Ms. B: True.

Mr. A: And even more importantly, the historical Adam seems to have some theological importance. When Paul discusses male/female relationships he asserts a male priority of sorts by saying that "Adam was formed first, then Eve." (1 Ti. 2:13)

Ms. B: True as well.

Mr. A: Even more importantly, a historical Adam seems to be linked to the fall and the atoning work of Christ. Paul declared in 1 Corinthians 15:22 that "as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive." Doesn't this imply that Adam is a historical person who has brought the fall to all humankind? So how can we mythologize Adam, unless we're going to mythologize Christ as well?

Ms. B: Good points Mr. A.

Mr. A: Yesterday I read John Piper in the "Christian Post". This is what he said. Ahem. "I think that it's very important that Adam be a historical figure, because that's the way he is treated by the other biblical writers. The heart passage in Romans 5 collapses, and the whole nature of God's making with Adam a covenant and then him failing and then Christ being a second Adam comes to naught, if he's not a historical person." I think he's right.

Ms. B: Hmmm, so you're saying it is time for me to pay the Piper?

Mr. A: How very droll of you Ms. B. But seriously, Romans 5:19 echoes the message of 1 Corinthians 15:22 by tying a universal fall to Adam and universal atoning work to Christ. So how can you suggest that there might not be a historical Adam? Isn't that like saying that we don't need a historical fall or a historical Jesus?

Ms. B: Mr. A, if you would be so kind to take a seat while I brew some rooibos tea. This might take awhile.

Advertisement
About this blog
An exploration of faith, knowledge, reason and doubt (with the occasional trite pop culture reference thrown in for good measure).
Array ( )