Wayne Nall Jr

CP Blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s).

Posted 2/23/14 at 5:13 PM | Wayne Nall

Five Secular Reasons To Support Traditional Marriage-Part 1

I continue my series here in support of the traditional view of marriage. Here are links to the first article “What Is Marriage?” and to the second article “Five Biblical Reasons to Support Traditional Marriage.

While I am a Christian and I get my values largely from my understanding of the Christian scriptures, I certainly realize that I live in a pluralistic society. There was a time in American history when the vast majority of U.S. citizens held these views, but that is no longer true. Because of this, I understand that an argument for the traditional view of marriage and against the revisionist view of marriage (as defined in my earlier article, “What Is Marriage?”) based solely on the Bible won't go very far with a lot of people in this increasing secular society. But is there a secular argument to be made for traditional marriage that all of us, no matter what our religious (or non-religious) affiliation may be? I certainly think so. FULL POST

Posted 2/13/14 at 10:16 PM | Wayne Nall

Five Biblical Reasons To Support Traditional Marriage

 I continue my series here in support of the traditional view of marriage. Here's a link to my first post: "What Is Marriage?"

 As a Christian, I look at the Bible as the final authority on issues that might affect my life and the society around me. It is the bedrock of my belief, and of countless millions around the world. Though this holiest of books has been subject to scorn and ridicule through the ages, it's truths have stood the test of time for millennia, while those who disparaged it have died and faded into obscurity.

 Unfortunately, many who profess the name of Christ don't know what the book that was written of Him even says. Because of this, they are wide open to misinformation about the truths of God's word, and they often fall pray to erroneous interpretations of it in order to fit better into the society around them. This is never more true than the issue of marriage. FULL POST

Posted 2/9/14 at 10:36 PM | Wayne Nall

What Is Marriage?

If you had told me twenty or even ten years ago that the most controversial issue in America in 2014 would concern the nature of marriage, I'm not sure that I would have believed you. However, I recently found out how controversial this is when a local TV station asked for comments concerned a proposed amendment to the Indiana constitution which would define marriage as an institution between a man and a woman. I noticed that almost all the comments were against the proposed amendment and for "same-sex marriage." Holding a different view and wanting to express it in a factual manner, I simply commented by giving three reasons that I believe in holding to the traditional view of marriage. To my surprise, I was repeatedly attacked as some kind of miscreant by those on the other side. The kindest thing that was said about me was that I was ignorant. One person wished that I would never be able to procreate! So much for tolerance.

 This highlights the fact that almost all the information that the average person gets through the media on the issue of "same-sex marriage" is totally one-sided. Once President Obama finally "evolved" in his views in 2012 (in an election year-imagine that!) to embrace "same-sex marriage", politicians in his party have almost exclusively lined up with him. Increasingly, even many conservatives and Republicans have embraced this new definition of marriage. And when the Supreme Court last year struck down the Defense of Marriage Act, the momentum for "marriage equality" picked up even more steam. In 2013 alone, seven states saw fit to recognize "same-sex marriage", making the total number of states recognizing these unions as of this moment to seventeen. Each one of these steps is covered glowingly by most mainstream media sources, and "marriage equality", as proponents cast the issue, is the civil rights issue of our time. Or so we are told. Militant opponents of traditional marriage would like to see those who oppose "same-sex marriage" as stigmatized as those who oppose racial equality. Increasingly, traditional marriage advocates such as myself are being lumped together with the KKK and the southern segregationists of the past. FULL POST

Posted 12/24/13 at 4:39 PM | Wayne Nall

A Christmas Story

"Put It On My Account"

It was three days before Christmas.

A middle-aged lady came into the tire store where I work to get her free tire rotation, which comes with a vehicle inspection.

The tech gave me the completed ticket so that I could check her out.
"Be sure to notice the inspection report," he said.

The inspection report is very detailed.
This vehicle needs a lot of work.
Tires and alignment.
Front brakes and rotors.
Rear brakes and rotors.

"Your vehicle needs some work," I explained to the lady.

Her eyes got big.
"What kind of work?"

I started with the wipers, thinking I need to break it to her gently.

As I went through the list with her, I could see her shoulders start to sag. The more I read, the more she slumped down.

"Can you tell me how much?" I give her a rough estimate. She slumped further.

I'm thinking, "Am I going to have to call the paramedics?" I'm worried. FULL POST

Posted 10/29/13 at 9:53 PM | Wayne Nall

Random Observations-On Government Shutdown and Obamacare Rollout

  • How much smarter Republicans in Congress would have been to just let the Obamacare fiasco play out without all the drama of the government shutdown? All the government shutdown did was mask the coverage of the horrible rollout of the Obamacare website. The Cruz strategy never made any sense to me at all.
  • Why should Republicans be the ones to push for delay of the individual mandate? The Dems own Obamacare lock, stock, and barrel. What some of the Tea Party type of Republicans have been pushing for is to push back the mandate past the 2014 elections, so that people don't see the full results of this administrations foolish policies until after the elections. I don't get this either!
  • I have a lot of sympathy for the goals of the Tea Party. However, the "take no prisoners" tactics that they have used turns a lot of people off and really poisons the water for all conservatives. (See Mike Huckabee's opening monologue from October 20th here-I couldn't agree more!)
  • I have seen this president squirm out from under so many things that would have destroyed almost any other president. Benghazi, Fast and Furious, IRS, etc. This is because the press has given him a pass on almost all of it. It's not working now. NBC, ABC, CNN, CBS are being just as hard on him about Obamacare as Fox and talk radio. It seems the honeymoon is finally over!
  • Watch this big Obamacare supporter describe her dismay at seeing her premiums skyrocket. Buyer remorse?

Want to read more? Here's links to other posts from my personal blog: FULL POST

Posted 9/14/13 at 9:29 PM | Wayne Nall

September 15, 1963

The Birmingham Church Bombing

50 Years Ago

My parents were living in Birmingham, Alabama, my mother's hometown, during the fall of 1963. My mother, Trina Nall, was expecting her first child (I would be born the following March.) She was working at the time as a secretary for the city of Homewood, one of the outlying suburbs. I remember her telling me as a child of the awful events of that day.

Those conversations I had with my mom came back to my mind recently as I was reading the excellent book entitled "While The World Watched" by Carolyn McKinstry. In her book, Mrs. McKinstry describes her life growing up as a black child in Birmingham, Alabama during the 1960's, culminating in the terrible bombing of her church, 16th Street Baptist, which took place that Sunday in September, 1963. She narrowly missed death in the bombing, but four of her young friends, Addie Mae Collins (age 14), Denise McNair (age 11), Carole Robertson (age 14), and Cynthia Wesley (age 14), were killed in the attack. The explosion blew a hole in the church's rear wall, destroyed the back steps and all but one stained-glass window, which showed Christ leading a group of little children. FULL POST

Posted 5/7/13 at 8:55 PM | Wayne Nall

Abolition and Abortion

I've been reading Eric Metaxas' masterful biography of William Wilberforce, Amazing Grace. Wilberforce was the late 18th century/early 19th century British Member of Parliament who almost single-handedly brought an end to the British slave trade. As a Christian MP, he devoted his life to this cause, and pursued it doggedly for almost twenty years until the abolition of the pernicious trade in 1807. During those years, he actually feared for his life on a number of occasions as those who opposed him and other abolitionists would go to no end to defend something that was actually indefensible. Wilberforce and others courageously exposed the evils of the slave trade year after year. They shined a light before the British public on the stomach-crawling conditions that the Africans were subjected to on the Middle Passage between Africa and the West Indies, as well as the horrific conditions that West Indian slaves were subjected to which actually made American slavery seem tame in comparison. FULL POST

Posted 4/28/13 at 4:42 PM | Wayne Nall

TR On Lincoln-The Great Statesman

I recently came across a short essay that Theodore Roosevelt wrote about Abraham Lincoln while Roosevelt was still president. He wrote these words when "politician" and "statesman" were synonymous and when neither word carried an onerous connotation. Below are excerpts from this essay with my comments following:

"...Lincoln's deeds and words, are not only of consuming interest to the historian, but should be intimately known to every man engaged in the hard practical work of American political life. It is difficult to overstate how much it means to a nation to have as the two foremost figures in its history men like Washington and Lincoln. It is good for every man in any way concerned in public life to feel that the highest ambition any American can possibly have will be gratified just in proportion as he raises himself toward the standards set by these two men...Such a study of Lincoln's life will enable us to avoid the twin gulfs of immorality and inefficiency--the gulfs which always lie one on each side of the careers alike of man and of nation. It helps nothing to have avoided one if shipwreck is encountered in the other. The fanatic, the well-meaning moralist of unbalanced mind, the parlor critic who condemns others but has no power himself to do good and but little power to do ill--all these were as alien to Lincoln as the vicious and unpatriotic themselves. His life teaches our people that they must act with wisdom, because otherwise adherence to right will be mere sound and fury without substance; and that they must also act high-mindedly, or else what seems to be wisdom will in the end turn out to be the most destructive kind of folly. Throughout his entire life, and especially after he rose to leadership in his party, Lincoln was stirred to his depths by the sense of fealty to a lofty ideal; but throughout his entire life, he also accepted human nature as it is, and worked with keen, practical good sense to achieve results with the instruments at hand. It is impossible to conceive of a man farther removed from baseness, farther removed from corruption, from mere self-seeking; but it is also impossible to conceive of a man of more sane and healthy mind--a man less under the influence of that fantastic and diseased morality (so fantastic and diseased as to be in reality profoundly immoral) which makes a man in this work-a-day world refuse to do what is possible because he cannot accomplish the impossible...


Posted 4/11/13 at 8:53 AM | Wayne Nall

Lincoln & Obama: Two Views of Welfare

I recently read a book of speeches and letters by Abraham Lincoln, and one particular letter caught my eye This was a letter Lincoln wrote to his step-brother in 1851 in response to a request for eighty dollars. He refused the request, but gave him a better alternative, namely work! Here's the text of the short letter with my comments following:

Dear Johnston: Your request for eighty dollars I do not think it best to comply with now. At the various times when I have helped you a little you have said to me, "We can get along very well now"; but in a very short time I find you in the same difficulty again. Now, this can only happen by some defect in your conduct. What that defect is, I think I know. You are not lazy, and still you are an idler. I doubt whether, since I saw you, you have done a good whole day's work in any one day. You do not very much dislike to work, and still you do not work much, merely because it does not seem to you that you could get much for it. This habit of uselessly wasting time is the whole difficulty; it is vastly important to you, and still more so to your children, that you should break the habit. It is more important to them, because they have longer to live, and can keep out of an idle habit before they are in it, easier than they can get out after they are in. FULL POST

Posted 4/2/13 at 10:12 PM | Wayne Nall

My Take On "The Bible" Series-Parts 9 and 10

This is the conclusion of a series of posts on "The Bible Series" To start at the beginning of the series, click here.

The Good-

  • Part 9-"Passion"-This hour depicted Christ's passion and His resurrection. I actually thought this was portrayed remarkably well. Parts of this were pretty much word-for-word out of the Bible, while other parts took some liberties from the sacred text. I thought Jesus' interview with Pilate was especially well-done. I was pleased that they included the scene with Pilate's wife, in which she told her husband that she had had a dream about Jesus, and warned her husband not to have anything to do with His death. It's an interesting biblical detail that most are unaware of. My wife and I were especially moved by the scene with Simone of Cyrene, the man who was chosen to carry Christ's cross. Now, we don't know exactly how all this happened, as only Luke tells this story. The other gospels speak of Jesus carrying his own cross, so scholars extrapolate that Jesus must have fallen down while carrying the cross and Simone was ordered to pick it up at that point. What was moving to us in "The Bible" version is that they had Simone helping Jesus carry his cross, so that Jesus and Simone finished walking the Via Delorosa together. I never thought of that possibility, but it could have indeed happened that way. I also was moved by the way that they showed Jesus being beaten every step of the way. I think that they showed "The Passion" about as realistically as they could have and still been fit to show on television. The actual torture of Christ must have been far worse. The resurrection scene was told more or less as the Book of John portrays it, which is mostly from Mary Magdalene's perspective. Although somewhat truncated, they did a good job of showing Jesus' varying appearances after His resurrection.
  • Part 10 - "Courage"- The final of hour of "The Bible" (which was actually only about 45 minutes as "The Passion" section ran a little over an hour) was about the rest of the New Testament. I enjoyed the portrayal of Paul's conversion, brief as it was. I enjoyed the portrayal of Paul, showing the change in this great Jewish intellect from persecutor to preacher (although it was rather annoying that they called him Paul of Tarsus when his pre-conversion name was actually Saul). I also appreciated how they showed what happened to each of the apostles, yet explaining that this was according to church tradition rather than actually from the Bible.


load more